Home / Guides / The EU sanctions 50% rule

The EU sanctions 50% ownership rule, explained

Last reviewed 24 June 2026.

Under the EU's 50% rule, an entity that is owned more than 50% by one or more sanctioned persons is itself caught by the asset freeze — even if that entity is not named on the list. A separate control test can catch entities at 50% or less. That's why screening issuer names alone leaves a gap.

What the 50% rule actually says

EU asset-freeze measures don't only bite the persons and entities named on the consolidated list. EU guidance treats an entity as subject to the same freeze if a listed person owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of it — alone or together with other listed persons (their stakes are aggregated). The practical effect: you must not make funds or economic resources available to that entity either, even though you won't find its name on the list.

"Control" — the test most people forget

Ownership is only half of it. An entity can also be caught where a listed person controls it despite holding 50% or less. Indicators of control include the right to appoint or remove a majority of the board, a majority of voting rights, or the ability to exercise decisive influence over the entity's decisions. Control is assessed on the facts, case by case — it is deliberately broader than a simple shareholding percentage.

Why a name match isn't enough

Listed persons rarely hold assets in their own name. They hold them through subsidiaries, holding companies and special-purpose vehicles that are usually not separately listed. A screening process that only compares your issuer names against the list will pass these straight through. Catching them requires ownership and control data — a look-through from the security you hold to the people who ultimately own or control the issuer.

What this means for a small fund

  • Treat the name-list match as a first filter, not the whole job.
  • For higher-risk issuers (e.g. those in or connected to sanctioned jurisdictions), check beneficial ownership and control, not just the name.
  • Free lists don't carry a full ownership graph — deep look-through usually needs a paid ownership-data provider or targeted manual diligence.
  • Document your reasoning either way: a recorded "checked ownership, no listed person >50%" is what evidences the decision later.
Veracore flags issuer and jurisdiction matches against the live EU list as a first pass — request a free portfolio screen to see it on your book, or try the free checker on a name.

FAQ

What is the EU sanctions 50% rule?
An entity owned more than 50% by one or more listed persons is itself subject to the asset freeze, even if it isn't separately named on the list.
Does it only apply above 50% ownership?
No — a separate control test can catch an entity at 50% or less if a listed person controls it (board, voting rights, decisive influence).
Why isn't matching names against the list enough?
Subsidiaries and holdings of listed persons usually aren't listed by name, so a name-only check misses them; you need ownership/control look-through.

Related

EU sanctions screening for fund managers · What to do when you find a sanctioned holding